The Caribbean Court of Justice will today hear an appeal filed by the Guyana Bank for Trade and Industry Ltd. and a cross-appeal by the respondent,NBA Jerseys Store, Desiree Alleyne a Guyanese who is a Resident Magistrate in Jamaica.This appeal stems from the majority decision of the Court of Appeal of Guyana comprising Justice of Appeal Yonnette Cummings-Edwards and additional Judge, Justice James Bovell Drakes who ruled on the 25th day of January,Jerseys NFL China, 2010 in favour of Alleyne allowing her appeal and ordering a re-trial, while the Acting Chancellor Justice Carl Singh dissented.The Court of Appeal by a majority decision, allowed an appeal filed by Desiree Alleyne, a Magistrate sitting in the Jamaican Magistracy, against a decision of former High Court Judge Justice B.S. Roy who had granted judgment in the sum of $10M to Guyana Bank for Trade and Industry.Justice Roy’s decision was based on a Contract of Guarantee the Bank alleged was signed and entered into by Alleyne on 9th August, 1996 before a Notary Public in Jamaica.The Guarantee, purportedly signed by Alleyne, guaranteed a Loan of $10M, which was granted to a Company, Wilzon Enterprise Incorporated which has since gone into liquidation and defaulted on its loan payments with the bank.The Contract of Guarantee which was purportedly signed by the Appellant in Jamaica was also signed by two employees of the bank as witnesses in Guyana.The legal battle commenced in March 2002, when the bank filed a writ against Alleyne, who was residing and working in Jamaica as a Magistrate at the time,Wholesale NFL Jerseys, for the sum of $10M,Cheap Jerseys Free Shipping, which was the total sum guaranteed under the Contract of Guarantee.According to attorney at law Lyndon Amsterdam, Alleyne had denied that she had signed and executed the Contract of Guarantee before a Notary Public, Vincent Chen in Jamaica.After a trial before Justice B.S. Roy, judgment was granted to the bank in July, 2005 and Alleyne subsequently approached the Court of Appeal.Several grounds of appeal were argued before the Court of Appeal by Alleyne’s attorney, Lyndon Amsterdam of the Law Firm Forde, Amsterdam and Lewis,Wholesale NBA Jerseys China, while Nikhil Ramkarran of Cameron and Shepherd represented the Guyana Bank of Trade and Industry.In his arguments, Amsterdam pointed out for the first time that the Writ of Summons filed on behalf of the Bank, did not comply with the Rules of Court and therefore was a nullity.This was in addition to the fact that the computer generated documents presented to the court by the bank did not comply with the provisions of the Evidence Act and therefore the evidence led before the Court did not prove the case against the Appellant, Alleyne during the trial.The attorney also successfully argued that the Contract of Guarantee had two possible dates, when it was signed “9th and 19th August, 1996”. The GBTI was not satisfied with the court of appeal ruling and has decided to take the matter to the final court,Cheap NFL Jerseys, the CCJ.Several points of Law will be argued before the C.C.J. These being: (a) Whether a Writ for service out the jurisdiction and filed on behalf of the Appellant/Bank and issued by the Registrar without Leave of the Court or a Judge was a Nullity or an Irregularity which was waived by the Respondent taking steps and filing documents in the Action; (b)?? ?Whether Computer generated documents were wrongly admitted into evidence by the Trial Judge; (c) Whether the Appellant should have proven that a demand letter was sent to the Respondent, Desiree Alleyne, before instituting the Action; (d) Whether the Trial Judge finding of facts of the Appellant at the Trial, was against the weight of the evidence; and (e)Whether the decision of the majority to Order a re-trial was wrong in Law.