Although he has already been found guilty and was awaiting sentencing, the Director of Public ProsecutionsConvicted: Samuel Hinds Jnr.(DPP) wants Magistrate Annette Singh to conduct a new trial for Samuel Hinds Jnr., the son of Prime Minister Samuel Hinds.The advice was returned from the DPP Chambers yesterday as the matter was once again called in the Georgetown Magistrates’ Court.Hinds, 34, had already been found guilty by former Magistrate Geeta Chandan-Edmond in relation to a wounding charge but the case was stalled since the Magistrate received marching orders from the Judicial Service Commission (JSC) the very day she was set to sentence him.Reading from the document that came from the DPP Chambers, the Prosecutor said that according to law, a final adjudication means a verdict plus a sentence. Since Magistrate Geeta Chandan-Edmond had only returned a verdict and did not announce a sentence, it was not a final adjudication.The court heard that the new presiding Magistrate may not sentence the defendant based on a trial conducted by another Magistrate. The DPP found that a new trial was befitting in the circumstance.Last month,jerseys cheap nfl, Magistrate Singh said that since Hinds has previously been found guilty, a retrial will be to overturn or appeal the guilty verdict, which she has no authority to do.Singh expressed readiness to go ahead and sentence the 34-year-old on the wounding charge. However, a date for sentencing has not yet been fixed. She said Hinds had already been found guilty in relation to the wounding charge and to restart the trial will be to overturn or appeal the guilty verdict.This,Cheap Jerseys Wholesale, the Magistrate had said, is something she has no jurisdiction to do. “So my opinion is to go ahead and sentence the defendant,Cheap Authentic Jerseys,” the open court heard.Amid questions as to the way forward, Police Prosecutor Corporal Renetta Bentham told the court that based on the facts, the DPP has advised that the issue was whether the guilty verdict of a previous Magistrate represents a final adjudication.Hinds’s attorney-at-Law, Peter Hugh, explained that his client had pleaded and had already been found guilty and to have him tried twice for the same offence would be to offend the rule of autrefois.He said that he does not agree with the direction the Prosecution is taking as his client ought not to be tried twice for the same offence under the principle of double jeopardy.Hearing both sides, the Magistrate adjourned the matter to April 17 to decide whether she would sentence Hinds or conduct a new trial. All parties were present in court yesterday, including the Probation Officer who was ordered to be present for the next hearing.Hinds was charged in relation to an altercation he had with his teenaged sister-in-law in February last year.Reports are that Hinds, who had accused his then 18-year-old sister-in-law, Tenza Lane, of stealing one of his cellular phones, flew in a fit and, brandished a gun,Wholesale Authentic Jerseys, thrashed and threatened to kill her at his Lot 83 Duke Street, Kingston residence on February 27, 2014.Following the incident, an unlawful wounding charge was instituted against Hinds.When Chandan-Edmond ruled in February she recapped that during the trial, the teenage girl and Police Constable Garraway were called to testify on behalf of the Prosecution. The Magistrate had said that as Hinds led his defence, he elected to give sworn evidence and called two witnesses, his fianc?e Sonia Herbert and the teen’s grandmother, Pamela Knight.The evidence, she said,NFL Jerseys From China, was reviewed bearing in mind the standard of proof required. The Magistrate said that as the witnesses gave their evidence,Cheap China Jerseys, she had the opportunity to observe them and found the teen to be honest when accounting the abusive assault she suffered.Magistrate Chandan-Edmond told the Court that she had addressed and fully considered the statement of Hinds and his two witnesses, but found that she “did not accept their account of what transpired.”“I find beyond reasonable doubt that I feel sure that as a result of the defendant’s actions, the victim was wounded,” the Magistrate had remarked. The court, she said, had also considered the content of the medical certificate issued to the teen after the attack. Hinds was found guilty as charged.But the very day Chandan-Edmond was expected to sentence Hinds with the aid of a probation report, the Probation Officer did not show and the former Magistrate was dismissed.Since then her matters were heard by Singh.